The same file,
four pairs of eyes.
We raised the bar for AI in healthcare. Being smart is not enough for an AI. Until now the question has been: can AI give the right answer? Our question was different: can it look at the same file through four different pairs of eyes and, in each one, reach the right decision together with its basis?
510 questions, four roles: MINA delivered
Everyone who makes decisions in healthcare looks at the same file from their own seat. The auditor looks for deductions, the hospital for the rule it can defend, the public assessor asks for the score, and the physician wants to know whether it will be reimbursed. We put MINA in each of these four roles and asked 510 questions. We required not only the right decision but also the correct rule behind it.
Results are from an internal evaluation on synthetic and anonymized scenarios (October 2026). The auditor and hospital roles answered the same 289 questions; 161 questions were used for public assessment and 60 for the physician.
The strongest result: 95.9%
The auditor and the hospital reached the same conclusion on the same file 95.9% of the time. Before the invoice is issued, before an objection is written, before the audit arrives.
For a hospital this means seeing what the auditor will see, with the same rule and the same basis, in advance. Deductions stop being a surprise, corrections are made before the invoice goes out, and the grounds for an objection are ready from the start.
Every decision with its basis
Next to each decision, MINA shows which rule or article it rests on. The bases used in this measurement:
- The 175 rules in the invoice review procedures
- SUT (Turkey's Health Implementation Communiqué) and EK-4A reimbursement coverage
- The public assessment directive and provincial board decisions
- Product licence and registration status
A model that works in the language of Turkish health regulation and states its decision with its basis, whichever role it looks from. That is MINA. The final call always stays with the expert.
See it on your own files
If you would like to see how this measurement plays out on your own files, you can request a POC. The work is done inside your institution's own environment, data does not leave the institution, and the final call always stays with your experts.
Related: TIS for hospitals · SIT-I for insurers · MINA
Frequently asked questions
What is MINA's four-role measurement?
The same healthcare files are read from the auditor's, the hospital's, the public assessor's and the physician's point of view. MINA answered each role's question; 510 questions were used in total.
How was an answer counted as correct?
A correct decision was not enough. The rule or article behind the decision also had to be correct; only when both were right did the answer count as correct.
Were the results measured on real patient data?
No. The results are from an internal evaluation on synthetic and anonymized scenarios; no institution's patient data was used.
What does it mean that the auditor and hospital reached the same finding?
The auditor and hospital roles reached the same finding on 95.9% of the same 289 files. A hospital can see what the auditor will see, with the same rule and basis, before issuing the invoice.
How can I see this measurement in my own institution?
You can request a POC. The work is done inside your institution's own environment, data does not leave the institution, and the final call always stays with your experts.